Peter Hewitt Care for Africa Foundation Inc (CfA) expects all employees and volunteers (in this policy called “employees”) to show competence, care, good faith and compliance with instructions, policies and procedures in the performance of their duties and to conduct themselves in a manner which respects the rights and welfare of other employees of CfA.
Where an employee’s work performance does not meet a satisfactory standard, an appropriate process of investigation and corrective action must be taken. The action taken will conform to the relevant legislation and accord with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. CfA is committed to ensuring that fair and effective systems exist for managing unsatisfactory work performance.
This policy is applicable in the management of all employees of CfA.
The management of unsatisfactory performance requires the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness to underpin all actions undertaken by supervisors.
The principles of natural justice are that:
a). all parties will have the right to be heard and judged without bias;
b). all issues will be investigated thoroughly and justly.
The principles of procedural fairness are that:
a). the standards of work performance required will be made clear to the employee by documentation or during counselling;
b). the employee will be made aware of the likely next steps if satisfactory performance is, or is not, maintained;
c). the employee will be afforded the right to be accompanied by a support person (or employee representative) at discussions or counselling interviews, at any level of the process; and
d). when a complaint about performance is brought to the supervisor’s attention by a third party, the substance of the complaint will be verified before any action is taken on the matter.
These procedures do not replace the normal responsibilities of a supervisor to discuss work issues with employees, to ensure that employees have a clear understanding of the work expected of them and to provide appropriate feedback on their performance.
The emphasis should always be on early intervention and informal resolution of a problem, as opposed to a more formal intervention at a later time.
Unless the matter is of a serious nature, the formal process of:
a). stage 1: managing for performance; and
b). stage 2: managing unsatisfactory performance;
should only be commenced when it becomes clear to the supervisor that a work performance problem has not been corrected through informal discussion between the supervisor and employee.
Nothing in this policy precludes CfA from terminating the employment of an employee for unsatisfactory performance.
This stage should be followed where informal discussions between the employee and the supervisor, about the employee’s performance, have not been successful, and where there are ongoing concerns regarding the employee’s performance.
While it is expected that the matter will be managed at the local level, the supervisor may discuss this part of the process with a more senior person or with the CEO.
a). As soon as problems or concerns regarding the employee’s performance appear, the supervisor should raise them with the employee.
b). When approaching the employee about the need to meet and discuss his or her poor performance, the supervisor should:
c). The supervisor must provide the employee with clear evidence or examples to demonstrate that the employee’s performance is unsatisfactory.
d). The supervisor will ensure the employee knows what is required of him or her in the work, and that he or she has the skills, resources and tools to do the job.
e). The supervisor must ensure that the employee understands the supervisor’s expectations with respect to work performance, and try to seek agreement from the employee around those expectations. The supervisor must ensure that these expectations are reasonable. Where the employee feels that the expectations are unreasonable, the supervisor must allow for the opportunity for discussion.
f). The supervisor must explore the possibility of any personal problems, health problems or other factors which may be impinging on the employee’s ability to perform his or her work. The supervisor may consider suggesting the employee assistance program (EAP) or other resources, if appropriate.
g). The supervisor must attempt to provide workable solutions and identify training and support requirements, where appropriate.
h). The supervisor must document the discussions with the employee, detailing areas of concern, mitigating factors, a defined and agreed period of time for improvement, and an improvement plan. A copy, signed by the employee, of these notes is to be kept by the supervisor, and a copy given to the employee.
a). The supervisor must monitor the employee’s performance.
b). The supervisor must meet with the employee as regularly as appears necessary, or as agreed.
a). employee has reached the agreed expectations, then the process will come to an end.
b). If, after a reasonable amount of time, it appears that satisfactory progress is not being made, the supervisor should liaise with his or her manager or the CEO. A “reasonable amount of time” will vary depending on the nature of the job and the commitment of the employee to improving his or her performance. It may be 4 weeks or it may be up to 2 or three 3 months. The supervisor, in conjunction with his or her manager or the CEO, will determine if it is appropriate to move to stage 2: managing unsatisfactory performance, or continue with stage 1: managing for performance.
a). The supervisor must advise the employee that the process is moving into stage 2: managing unsatisfactory performance, and arrange for a meeting. Depending on the number of issues that need to be covered, this meeting may become a number of meetings.
b). At the meeting or meetings:
c). The supervisor will conclude the meeting ensuring that:
d). New matters should not be raised during the review period, unless considered of a serious nature.
a). Following the meeting, and preferably within 5 working days, the employee is provided with a letter, or record of meeting, confirming the matters discussed and a copy of the proposed improvement plan.
b). The improvement plan should include:
c). It is recommended that, in addition, a working review plan is used to document the feedback which will be provided to the employee at the regular review meetings. This may include the tasks set for the review period (eg, a week or a fortnight), the anticipated time required to complete the task, and feedback on the tasks.
d). The employee should sign a copy of the documentation to indicate receipt and that it is a true and accurate record of what was discussed between the parties. If the employee disagrees with the content of the document, or wishes to make additional comments, he or she may provide a written statement in response. Any such additional documentation submitted by the employee must stay with the original record of meeting.
a). The employee’s performance is monitored on a regular basis as per the agreed timeframe in the improvement plan. Where necessary, documentation is reviewed by the supervisor with the employee present, to ensure that the employee understands the plan and the possible consequences of not meeting the supervisor’s expectations.
b). Where the employee has met the supervisor’s expectations, this will be confirmed in a letter stating that the process has been completed.
c). If there is not satisfactory improvement within the agreed timeframe, the employee is to be provided with a written warning outlining the areas of concern and the lack of improvement.
a). When the employee has been given a reasonable number of opportunities to improve his or her performance and has not done so, a final counselling session will be conducted and a final warning issued.
b). This step is to take place in consultation with the CEO.
c). The final warning will again provide the employee with a specified period of time to improve his or her performance, and the warning will advise that the consequences of failing to perform satisfactorily are understood.
d). If sufficient improvement has occurred, the review period will continue.
e). If, after issuing a final warning, sufficient improvement has not occurred during the specified period, another meeting is to be held with the supervisor and the employee.
f). If the employee’s response at the meeting is unsatisfactory as to why his or her performance has not achieved the required standard, the supervisor will inform the employee that further disciplinary action or termination of employment, or both, may follow. The supervisor will invite the employee to offer any mitigating circumstances as to why his or her employment should not be terminated.
g). The supervisor must record and give consideration to matters raised by the employee, as well as factors including the employee’s length of service and past record.
a). If the decision is to recommend disciplinary action or termination of the employee, the supervisor will consult with his or her manager or the CEO
b). The supervisor, in consultation with his or her manager or the CEO may decide to:
CfA will in application of this policy have regard to the desirability of maintaining confidence in its ability to maintain and attract volunteers. Whilst it is recognised that a policy which applies to employees and volunteers may have limitations with respect to application to volunteers, the general principles will apply equally to volunteers and to persons that are in the paid employment of the organisation.
If you require further information, please speak with your manager.
CFA-P13.V1. Performance Management Policy – Effective Date: 26 April 2020 Document Approved By: Board of Management.
Controlled Document — Printed Versions are not controlled.